yeh, about that.that is why Glock SpamCombat is my best friend, although when i have my computer off for 4-5 hours and have 4-6,000 messages waiting for me, it is a while before i am back to normal.
but anyway, whatever WHB did this week is amazing, i went from that to about 20 spam an hour, which is nothing!
but still i would like to see what is being rejected.
Okay I'm slow. The disappearance of the spam is great. However, after not receiving a "recurring bill notification" I belatedly realized that "no spam" comes with a consequence. I received the quarantine lists, or summaries, for about a week but haven't gotten any now for a long long time. Can we have them back please? I'm on Alpha. Do I have to specifically ask for them for our account(s)?
Is MailFoundry running on rs6 now?
Seeing strange "reduction" in spam.
Colin,
I am seeing the same "reduction" on RS10.
I think it is a general reduction of SPAM on the Internet, as I large enterprise I support (in Australia) is seeing a similar effect. SPAM has dropped over the last week to about 10% of the previous volume.
Hopefully the dumbarse spammers are giving up and trying some other way to make fast money for nothing?? ;-)
Aaron
______________________________
[B][URL="http://aztech.net.au/"]Aztech Networks[/URL][/B]
Quality IT and Hosting Solutions
Check out our current [URL="http://aztech.net.au/support/link.php?id=1"]Hosting Services[/URL]
Either that or them there arrests in recent weeks did a serious crippling number of the availability of spam bot nets to spew the crap.
Hey All,
I received a legitimate email with the subject tagged as spam. How do I submit the domain to be added to the white list? Here is the top of the header:
Return-path: <EVGANews@mail2.evga.com>
Envelope-to: wcs@thewebbs.net
Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:47:36 +0000
Received: from mail.evga.com ([65.113.29.35] helo=mail2.evga.com)
by ss1.whbdns.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68)
(envelope-from <EVGANews@mail2.evga.com>)
id 1J2dAd-00020o-F7
for wcs@thewebbs.net; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:47:36 +0000
Received: from evga.com ([10.0.0.13]) by mail2.evga.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:47:26 -0800
Mail-System-Version: Broadc@st HTML 4.5.5
X-Sender: EVGANews@evga.com
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:26:45 -0800
From: <EVGANews@evga.com>
To: "wcs@thewebbs.net" <wcs@thewebbs.net>
Reply-To: EVGANews@evga.com
Thanks for Mail Foundry!
RCraig
Got another one:
Return-path: <deals-owner+M179@list.compuplus.com>
Envelope-to: wcs@thewebbs.net
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:04:37 +0000
Received: from horiyos.teamgenesis.com
([63.208.156.20] helo=horiyos.capalon.com ident=postfix)
by ss1.whbdns.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68)
(envelope-from <deals-owner+M179@list.compuplus.com>)
id 1J2yyb-0005kv-Jj
for wcs@thewebbs.net; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:04:37 +0000
Received: from list.compuplus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by horiyos.capalon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C86417DEC0;
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:00:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (serv3 [10.237.142.35])
by horiyos.capalon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB7C16F211
for <deals-list.compuplus.com@capalon.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:30:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from terumah.compuplus.com (terumah.teamgenesis.com [63.208.156.129])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by horiyos.capalon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243A6166B82
for <deals@list.compuplus.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:00:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from terumah.compuplus.com (www-data@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by terumah.compuplus.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-20) with ESMTP id lBDJ63YQ019843
for <deals@list.compuplus.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:06:03 -0500
Received: (from www-data@localhost)
by terumah.compuplus.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id lBDJ63Ol019841;
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:06:03 -0500
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:06:03 -0500
Message-Id: <200712131906.lBDJ63Ol019841@terumah.compuplus.com >
To: Deals Mailing List <deals@list.compuplus.com>
From: "Comp-U-Plus.com" <cpservice@compuplus.com>
Thanks,
RCraig
Hi All,
To update you on MailFoundry... Some of the units are not performing to expectations. Approximately 25% of servers are covered by several MailFoundry units at this time, but a lot of the spam prevention is hit or miss. To this extent, we're working on a custom, in-house solution that will deployed in January. We're going to be comparing the effectiveness of this versus MailFoundry.
Matt
The above posted false positives are the only two I have received (that I know of.) I use to get about 600 spams a day, but now I only get a few dozen. While not perfect, the MailFoundry solution is so much better than not having a filter at all. Thank you for this service. It was why I changed who I hosted with to WebHostingBuzz.
RCraig